Skip to main content

Programs == Rules

 When crafting an algorithm for dealing with some kind of problem, we usually are involved with designing rules that transform the input data into output data. The programming language is a method convenient to humans for rules specification. But generally, the computer itself does not need anything more than low-level binary instructions to transform input data into some desired output.

Although high-level programming languages have proven to be of much aid to the human intellect when it comes to crafting rules that the computer can follow, it also comes with some bottlenecks and as we now realise when it comes to problems whose rules cannot be easily specified we use machine learning to discover models that map the input to output. 

Machine learning methods especially deeplearning have proven to be potent tools when we need to discover a model or a set of rules that map the input to output and will continually augment many algorithm development activities but they also come with their own bottlenecks. They are not very transparent in how the rules determine the output, and their performance is very bad requiring very large compute resources to perform simple operations. 

Machine learning, which is based on statistics might not be the only way to generate rules that map inputs to output, in the future it will be possible to generate rules automatically using some other methods, rules that are much simpler to execute and thus much more efficient than current machine learning systems. 


Popular posts from this blog

Next Steps Towards Strong Artificial Intelligence

What is Intelligence? Pathways to Synthetic Intelligence If you follow current AI Research then it will be apparent to you that AI research, the deep learning type has stalled! This does not mean that new areas of application for existing techniques are not appearing but that the fundamentals have been solved and things have become pretty standardized.

At the edge of a cliff - Quantum Computing

Source: Quantum computing reminds me of the early days of computer development (the 50s - 60s) where we had different companies come up with their different computer architectures. You had to learn how to use one architecture then move to another then another as you hoped to explore different systems that were better for one task than they were for another task.  

What you actually need to become an expert programmer

 When it comes to programming, there is no reasonable shortcut to practice. What kind of practice am I talking about? Does it mean we should spend all day on  Leetcode  or  Hackerrank ? No, you don't have to but it is very important that you spend sufficient time on these platforms to improve the quality of your programming expressibility.